Dar totusi, imi place sum “SUNA” aici: [url=http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2009/02/12/conficker-activity-update.aspx]Conficker Activity Update[/url] si sunt mai mult ca sigur ca cei de la Microsoft au urgent nevoie de autorul virusului.

Si asta ma face sa cred ca Microsoftul nu este singura companie care se confrunta cu probleme de acest gen.

doar ca acum mARILE companii nu doresc sa “strice” imaginea…

Cel mai recent exemplu este MicroSoft, care ofera $250.000 celui care va gasi autorul virusului Conficker. Sunt sigur ca daca il “aresteaza” pe autor, nu il vor trimite la racoare

-

Kaspersky Lab’s specialists investigated the incident and hired an independent expert, Next Generation Security Software’s David Litchfield, to corroborate the results of the internal investigation, and to confirm that no data was leaked. Litchfield’s report was delivered to Kaspersky Lab on Thursday, February 12, 2009, and confirmed that no data had in fact been compromised from the site.

Litchfield’s report states the following:

“The usa.kaspersky.com website and database were successfully breached early on Saturday morning on the 7th of February. Kaspersky was deliberately targeted. The attacker, based in Romania, used Google to search for web servers owned by Kaspersky running applications that may be vulnerable to SQL injection. The attacker claims to have been able to access private customer information but has publicly stated that no data was compromised. The attacker’s claim to be able to access customer data is correct and, as is apparent from the web server log files, the attacker did attempt to gain access to customer data however, the attempts failed. At no point was customer data accessed. On the Saturday, the attacker published the fact that the usa.kaspersky.com web site was vulnerable to SQL injection. This caused a number of other attackers from various locations to probe the site further. None of these followup attackers accessed any customer data either. On hearing of the threat, Kaspersky immediately took down the vulnerable web server, preventing further and deeper breaches.”

Adica, in traducere suna cam asa:”… Laboratorul Kasperky ar face foarte bine sa sa prinda acel hacker… si sa-l angajeze la lucru…”

Chiar si cei de la Kaspersky spun:”…a fost o lectie de care trebuie sa tinem cont…”

Doar ca ei spun ca hakerul nu obtinut nici un byte de informatie confidentiala, interesant de ce?

Ziceai de chestii de pe .gov si alte faze din astea. Poti ai din astea atata timp cat nu citeste nimeni blogul. Cand devii popular oamenii incep sa fie mai atenti la ceea ce faci.

stii sa scrii mult prost si mai ales fara rost, atat.
exista site-uri de acest gen de cel putin 10 ani, care fac exact aceleasi lucruri daca nu chiar mai mult, si stai lejer ca totul e perfect legal, altfel nu ar fi stat 10 ani in picioare asa ca mai informeaza-te inainte sa arunci cu sume la misto. de curizitate vezi ca sunt 2a dburi de exploituri pe .gov si un FD pe .edu perfect listate, daca nu stiai.